The Eleiko IPF Powerlifting Belt by Muhammad Amir Ayub

The belt

The belt

As I mentioned before in a previous blog post, I managed to burst open my previous powerlifting belt made by Strength Apparel. Having felt the difference between a proper powerlifting belt and a cheap lifting belt, I knew that I had to buy another powerlifting belt; the security during a final set is real and not a placebo effect kind of thing. Another fellow "competitive powerlifter" (you can train and have a day job, or should I say need one) suggested that I buy an IPF-sanctioned belt so that I can compete in IPF-sanctioned meets, which have 2 distinguishing features: there is drug testing (so the playing field is much more fair), and weigh-ins are basically just prior to the meet (so you can't play around with weight manipulation which can lead you to be competing with athletes up to at least 5 kg's heavier than their weigh-in weight). And so I stumbled upon Zealfit, who apparently sells such a belt, made by Eleiko.

Search results on Google

Search results on Google

The belt on the website

The belt on the website

Online it’s difficult to find a price internationally to compare the value. This is basically the best I got:

Which amounts to like 1230 ringgit

Which amounts to like 1230 ringgit

After getting in touch with the rep (it's basically a one man shop selling stuff from his house at the moment, but having good enough business to even be fitting commercial gyms like Celebrity Fitness with heavy metal), he managed to give me a discounted price of 950 ringgit. That's more than 4 times what I paid for the Strength Apparel belt, but I've made more "expensive purchases" (think fountain pens). And so we made a deal to meet up, tried out the belt and bought it (no credit cards accepted at the moment, just hard cash). And so here's the belt:

It actually appears as thought the Eleiko belt is a bit thinner than the Strength Apparel belt; otherwise they weigh more or less the same (the Elieko belt weight is stated as 1 kg while there is no weight stated for the Strength Apparel belt on the website). The circumference of the loop of the Eleiko belt this better; the one on the Strength Apparel belt is too small, making it difficult to thread the strap in (important for lifts such as the deadlift and squat). The Eleiko belt feels a bit softer when trying to bend the belt in the superior-inferior direction as well as when trying to wear it. Performing single rep lifts with the Strength Apparel belt felt sturdier because it is much tougher, but it is not so suited for doing lifts with multiple reps. Only a few weeks prior to the belt bursting did it feel comfortable enough wearing it, where it did not pinch my skin at my chest/lower abs when in the bottom position of a deadlift or squat (this made my tempo slower and made it harder to deadlift multiple reps with my weak grip strength).

Comparison of the three belts

Comparison of the three belts

Comparison of the buckle end

Comparison of the buckle end

The inner side of the belt

The inner side of the belt

The scuff marks on the old belt rubbing agains the loop can be appreciated. I hook the old belt into the third pair of holes and the new belt into the second pair.

The scuff marks on the old belt rubbing agains the loop can be appreciated. I hook the old belt into the third pair of holes and the new belt into the second pair.

The bane of white; any scuff marks are easily seen

The bane of white; any scuff marks are easily seen

So I've run it through it's paces of a "training week" and this is what I'll say about it: So far so good. There's a balance to be ensured between stiffness (and hence support) and comfort and I believe this belt is more in the middle than the stiffness extreme. No more bruising at my lower ribs/lower abs from pinching by an extremely stiff belt; there is no acclimatization period. And yet it is still stiff enough to give proper support. I think that the slight softness of the belt may provide some longevity by allowing it to withstand the stresses of lifting. But I do not really like the white color; it's just asking to be stained. Unfortunately, there is no black option (my favorite color). The strap length beyond the first set of holes is also a little short, making it a little bit harder to slip it into the loop (not needed when performing military presses), but at least the loop isn't too small such that I have to use strength to pull the strap in.

According to the seller, this belt was with him since 2016 but otherwise untouched. Let's see how long it lasts; preferably at least 2 years to make the belt worth it's expense (as well as the brand's reputation) compared to the old belt.

Random Thoughts (28/3/18) by Muhammad Amir Ayub

1) Thinking of deleting Facebook? Here's some accounts of people managing a life less dominated by it. And if you really want to see how creepy Facebook is (I'm sure Google is just the same), go ahead and download how much it knows about you.

You’ll see a detailed history of chats, phone numbers (wonder how it managed to get those because we don’t remember sharing ours) and much more – it’s like having your very own FB page, but offline.

2) Medical schools should definitely prioritize nutrition and lifestyle education. Preventive medicine is a key tenet in achieving health. The only problem is that nutrition and exercise science does not have a robust research culture as clinical medicine. Low fat or no to low fat (I believe personally that intentional low fat causes more harm)? How much should we reduce salt (everyone agrees that we take too much sodium in general)? Are we facilitating a more active lifestyle? Cardio vs strength (both are good)? The dietary cholesterol debate (no correlation)? Pharma companies won't sponsor such studies, but they must be done nonetheless as they are intuitively effective and cost-saving. We have so many questions that need to be answered. And just in time, my friend shared this, which really encapsulates the problem with evidence-based health promotion.

This movie displays all the great characteristics of really bad thinking. Confusing causation with correlation in clinical trials? Check. Cherry picking data to support your view while ignoring data to the contrary (i.e., “confirmation bias)? Check. Relying on “experts” who are selling books and seminars but have nothing to do with real science, as evidenced by their fundamental misunderstand of basic physiology (carbs can’t make you fat? diabetes is caused by chicken consumption?) –> Chickity check.

3) People in Vietnam are publishing critical research on severe dengue, characterizing features (including serial echocardiography) that predict the risk of shock and pulmonary edema among such patients. How about us?

4) After so long not playing on the competitive Street Fighter 5 scene, Infiltration has been totally dominating out of nowhere.

Try out Backblaze for free and protect your precious files.